Go Back

Timo Vihavainen

Timo Juhani Vihavainen
Born May 9, 1947, Sulkava.

Master of Arts (General History), 1970, Licentiate of Philosophy, 1983, and Doctor of Philosophy (General History), 1988, University of Helsinki

Professor of Russian Studies, University of Helsinki, 2002–2015
Senior Research Fellow, Academy of Finland, Suomen Akatemian vanhempi tutkija 2000–2002
Director, Finnish Institute in St Petersburg, 1998–2000
Acting assistant, East European history, Helsingin yliopistossa 1980–1998 (intermittent)
Classroom Teacher, Vantaa Municipality, 1975–1980

Publications, Research Projects and other Academic Activity
Research interests
Finland in the Soviet Press, norms and values in the Soviet Union 1920s–50s, public opinion in the Soviet Union, 1920s and 1930s, intelligentsia and petit bourgeoisie in the Soviet Union, Finnish-Soviet relations and neighbourliness, consumerism and consumerist ideology in the Russian Federation and the Soviet Union

Awards
Honorary Doctor, Petrozavodsk State University, 2005
Badge of the Order of Friendship 2014, Russian Federation
History Book of the Year 2014 for Vanhan Venäjän paluu (‘The return of old mother Russia’), Historian Ystäväin Liitto (‘Association of the friends of history’)

Written by Timo Vihavainen (Riitta-Ilona Hurmerinta, ed.)
Translated by John Calton

Time abroad with Russians

I am sincerely grateful that I only had relatively few administrative duties. Of course, someone has to take care of those things and there is no point in grumbling if you don’t do it yourself. But for some reason I have always seen meetings and bureaucracy as a negative thing and I think that every bureaucrat’s duty should be to understand that they are in principle unnecessary and even harmful – the institutions that is, not the people.

The best meetings that I took part in were with Osmo Jussila, who often managed to get through the agenda in a quarter of an hour and in my opinion still did not leave anything of substance undone.  

I had quite a lot of involvement in international relations, especially with the Russians. These duties were related to historical research symposiums, as well as organising seminars and research collaboration. There was a remarkable amount of these activities from the 1960s on, which is probably hard to understand today, and I was involved in them in the 1970s and beyond. My work with the Scientific and Technical Co-operation Committee Working Group consisted of translating, organising and even interpreting.

My projects were always in collaboration with our Russian partners and I remember that the co-operation always went well. In my work as a director of the Finnish Institute in St Petersburg, the old network was exceedingly helpful and I can say that during my time the institute enjoyed popularity among the St Petersburg intelligentsia, especially scholars.

To some extent, I also participated in research and teacher exchanges and lectures at the University of Petrozavodsk. The diligence and enthusiasm of students at that place made an impression on me.

In addition to the international exchanges with Russia there were of course ones with the West, especially with departments in London and Paris. I should also mention the United States, a superpower in the field, although I only went to conferences there a couple of times. We certainly got outstandingly capable research guests to pay return visits.

Timo Vihavainen giving a farewell lecture called ‘Russia and Europe’ in May, 2015. Credit: Mika Federley.​
Timo Vihavainen giving a farewell lecture called ‘Russia and Europe’ in May, 2015. Credit: Mika Federley.​

 

Go Back