Mika Lavento
Humanist of the day

Mika Lavento

Mika Lavento, professor of archaeology, is engaged in archaeological research all around the world. His primary focus has been research in the taiga, but he has also conducted extensive field work in Greece and the Middle East. Archaeology fascinates Professor Lavento because it combines many disciplines. Archaeological methods are also developing rapidly. New research material is increasing all the while and has the potential to change, even radically, our conceptions of the past.

Mika Lavento

Born March 29, 1962, Kajaani

Master of Arts 1989, Licentiate 1997, PhD 2001
Docent in archaeology 2001, University of Helsinki

Professor of archaeology 2004–, University of Helsinki
Senior research fellow 2008–09 Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters
University lecturer 2001–03, University of Helsinki
Research associate 1991–2001, University of Helsinki
Field researcher 1986–91, Finland's National Board of Antiquities

Publications, research projects and other academic activity
Research themes:
The Bronze Age, the late Neolithic Stone Age, geoarchaeology, archaeological inventory

Positions of responsibility, awards and special achievements:
Member of the Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters 2012–
President of the Finnish Antiquarian Society 2010–
President of the Archaeological Society of Finland 1999–2002

Photo: Mika Federley
Written by Mika Lavento (Kaija Hartikainen ed.)
Translated by Matthew Billington

My own research material is connected to the Bronze and Early Metal Age. The material is constantly increasing, significantly affecting our conceptions of the past. I have conducted field work at Bronze and Early Metal Age sites in Finland, Russia and the Baltic countries and have studied artefacts using a variety of methods. The approaches can be both science- and humanities-based, and the knowledge acquired with their help is used as the starting point for understanding human communities.

Read more

My best memories from the university of Helsinki are linked to various situations. Learning has involved not only the acquisition of new knowledge but also what research has brought to me personally. While conducting field work I have met a diverse range of people and unexpected things have occurred. An archaeologist’s specialty is long periods of field work in different corners of the globe. The most interesting moments have involved investigating surprising environments and places and the observations and finds that have arisen as a result. For me this has been in different parts of Finland, with Finno-Ugrian peoples and in the Middle East in a multidisciplinary Centre of Excellence project led by Jaakko Frösén in Jordan. They have enriched my world and helped me see how life is lived differently elsewhere.

Read more

I became acquainted with administration when our previous professor of archaeology retired and the Institute for Cultural Research needed a new director. I had practically no choice but to take on this responsibility. I had no experience of the work, but that soon changed. I received help from others and by pondering things together we made progress.

Read more

My own discipline, archaeology, has been in the media spotlight in various ways, and it clearly interests the general public. In practice, every archaeological dig is reported in one way or another. Archaeologists themselves have influenced reporting by describing the methods and findings of digs. In additions, journalists may have their own ideas which they want to use.

Read more

I come from a small northern town where the opportunities for gaining knowledge and broadening one’s worldview were less than optimal. Thus, Helsinki, with its innumerable possibilities, offered an entirely different environment for thinking. When I came to the University in 1981, the degree system had just been overhauled. Although it was soon recognised that it was not such a great success, for me it was essential that no one prevented me from studying different subjects in different faculties. Conducting research elsewhere in Finland or abroad was also a clear aim. Radical thinking was possible and no one interfered – after all it is a natural part of science.

Read more